Moe Arora: “This is the thing: When you hit 28 or 30, everything begins to...

“This is the thing: When you hit 28 or 30, everything begins to divide. You can see very clearly two kinds of people. On one side, people who have used their 20s to learn and grow, to find … themselves and their dreams, people who know what works and what doesn’t, who have pushed through to become…

(Source: meredithbklyn, via moearora)

Comments (View)
Quote:

The pure present is an ungraspable advance of the past devouring the future. In truth, all sensation is already memory.End quote.

—Henri Bergson
Comments (View)

I’m in love!

Comments (View)
(via sassycas, disturbedlights)
Comments (View)
Human

Human

Comments (View)

Why love songs must be sad - A Nick Cave perspective

The following is a copy/paste of a Nick Cave essay from here

I was invited to actually teach a group of adult students about songwriting. But first they wanted me to give a public lecture. The subject I chose was the love song, and in doing it - I mean, standing up in front of a crowd of people and teaching, lecturing - I was filled with a host of conflicting feelings. The strongest, most insistent of these was one of abject horror. Horror, because my late father was an English literature teacher at the high school I attended back in Australia - you know, where the sun shines. I have very clear memories of being about 12 and sitting in a classroom watching my father, who would be standing, up here, where I am standing, and thinking to myself, gloomily and miserably - for, in the main, I was a gloomy and miserable child - “It doesn’t really matter what I do with my life as long as I don’t end up like my father.” Now, at 41, it would appear there is virtually no action I can take that does not draw me closer to him, that does not make me more like him. At 41, I have become my father, and here I am, ladies and gentlemen, teaching.

Looking back over the past 20 years, a certain clarity prevails. Amidst the madness and the mayhem, it would seem I have been banging on one particular drum. I see that my artistic life has centred around an attempt to articulate an almost palpable sense of loss that laid claim to my life. A great gaping hole was blasted out of my world by the unexpected death of my father when I was 19. The way I learned to fill this hole, this void, was to write. My father taught me this as if to prepare me for his own passing. Writing allowed me direct access to my imagination, to inspiration and, ultimately, to God.

I found that, through the use of language, I was writing God into existence. Language became the blanket that I threw over the invisible man, which gave him shape and form. The actualisation of God through the medium of the love song remains my prime motivation as an artist. I found that language became a poultice to the wounds incurred by the death of my father. Language became a salve to longing.

The loss of my father created in my life a vacuum, a space in which my words began to float and collect and find their purpose. WH Auden said, “the so-called traumatic experience is not an accident, but the opportunity for which the child has been patiently waiting - had it not occurred, it would have found another - in order that its life became a serious matter”. The death of my father was this “traumatic experience” that left the hole for God to fill. How beautiful the notion that we create our own personal catastrophes and that it is the creative forces within us that are instrumental in doing this. Here, our creative impulses lie in ambush at the side of our lives, ready to leap forth and kick holes in it - holes through which inspiration can rise. We each have our need to create, and sorrow itself is a creative act.

Though the love song comes in many guises - songs of exaltation and praise, of rage and of despair, erotic songs, songs of abandonment and loss - they all address God, for it is the haunted premise of longing that the true love song inhabits. It is a howl in the void for love and for comfort, and it lives on the lips of the child crying for his mother. It is the song of the lover in need of their loved one, the raving of the lunatic supplicant petitioning his God. It is the cry of one chained to the earth and craving flight, a flight into inspiration and imagination and divinity. The love song is the sound of our endeavours to become God-like, to rise up and above the earth-bound and the mediocre. I believe the love song to be a sad song. It is the noise of sorrow itself.

We all experience within us what the Portuguese call “saudade”, an inexplicable longing, an unnamed and enigmatic yearning of the soul, and it is this feeling that lives in the realms of imagination and inspiration, and is the breeding ground for the sad song, for the love song. Saudade is the desire to be transported from darkness into light, to be touched by the hand of that which is not of this world. The love song is the light of God, deep down, blasting up though our wounds.

In his brilliant lecture, The Theory And Function Of Duende, Frederico Garcia Lorca attempts to shed some light on the eerie and inexplicable sadness that lives at the heart of certain works of art. “All that has dark sounds has ‘duende’,” he says, “that mysterious power that everyone feels but no philosopher can explain.” Contemporary rock music seems less inclined to have at its soul, restless and quivering, the sadness that Lorca talks about. Excitement, often, anger, sometimes - but true sadness, rarely. Bob Dylan has always had it. Leonard Cohen deals specifically with it. It pursues Van Morrison like a black dog and, though he tries to, he cannot escape it. Tom Waits and Neil Young can summon it. My friends The Dirty 3 have it by the bucketload. But, all in all, it would appear that the duende is too fragile to survive the compulsive modernity of the music industry. In the hysterical technocracy of modern music, sorrow is sent to the back of the class, where it sits, pissing its pants in mortal terror. Duende, needs space to breathe. Melancholy hates haste and floats in silence. I feel sorry for sadness, as we jump all over it, denying its voice and muscling it into the outer reaches. No wonder sorrow doesn’t smile much. No wonder sadness is so sad.

All love songs must contain “duende”, because the love song is never simply happy. It must first embrace the potential for pain. Those songs that speak of love, without having within their lines an ache or a sigh, are not love songs at all, but rather hate songs disguised as love songs, and are not to be trusted. These songs deny us our human-ness and our God-given right to be sad, and the airwaves are littered with them. The love song must resonate with the whispers of sorrow and the echoes of grief. The writer who refuses to explore the darker reaches of the heart will never be able to write convincingly about the wonder, magic and joy of love, for just as goodness cannot be trusted unless it has breathed the same air as evil, so within the fabric of the love song, within its melody, its lyric, one must sense an acknowledgement of its capacity for suffering.

Comments (View)
Quote:

Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against itEnd quote.

—Rumi
Comments (View)
Quote:

If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy youEnd quote.

—Yeshua
Comments (View)

The Egregore of Facebook

I often feel the urge to visit facebook even though I know there will be nothing interesting there except lame updates about farmville and inane links. But still I check it out atleast 4 times a day. I think the egregore of facebook has grown very strong with its close to 300 million user base. It’s time not to feed this beast anymore. From now on, its going to be less and less of it. It will be a conscious move. I suggest the same to anyone who’s reading it. We must stop the beast before it consumes us.Dark night

Comments (View)

Boy I feel ignorant now

arjunbala4u: Dei what do you think about art of living ?
me: its ok... but they charge a lot..and they also trademark their teachings... thats a bit of corporate bullshit... you can actually get what they're teaching freely..if you know where to look..
arjunbala4u: Whats wrong in trade marking da ?
lol
me: if you really think that knowledge is free... etc.. you wouldn;t do it.. instead you would put up all your course material for free online... and live off in donations...
arjunbala4u: all right
me: trademark soaps/ electronics.... logos etc..but not this kind of knowlegde..
arjunbala4u: I agree, In Ramana Ashram, I noticed one thing, There were a significant proportion of non Indians to Indians
me: yeah... i saw the lectures on youtube..and noticed the same..
arjunbala4u: Moreover, ask any bugger walking on the road about Ramana Maharishi or yoga, he will blink. Considering the fact that there is so much spiritual wealth in India, we still are people who run after money ourselves ??
me: hehe... the irony.... the east is trying to become the west..while the west is looking for support towards the east..
arjunbala4u: The other nations are aggresively taking to spirituality and well-being, including buggers who wrote books like 'Monk who sold the ferrari', which you could call a major rip off from our knowledge base
me: there is no OUR here... you dint write it...there is no INDIA... there aren't any borders... its all man made... so anyone can take inspiration from anything.. just because something originated in this portion of land called india, it doesnt mean that it belongs to that place...
arjunbala4u: I have read Sri Sri Ravishankar's book 'Guru of Joy', and he has lived the life of a pucca ascetic before all this. It doesnt belong here
But it was codified here right ?
Codification being only an event, and not with a trade mark ? Ultimately the truth cannot be owned or demarcated on any ground
me: so ..you think INDIANS did it? were the aryans called indians? this land is a land of two diff races... there was no india back then...hinduism was a achievement of the aryan people... then again the aryans decended from the negro and so and so forth.... i cant believe how you consider those things as INDIAN...you might as well call them asians too...
arjunbala4u: Its not about Hinduism da
okay
wat do you have to say about the Mahabharata ?
Do you agree that that arose after Hinduism arose ?
me: traditionally there is a great divide... that is the split between eastern thinking and western thought... that is it.. there is no Indian, chinese etc... they are more or less aligned... but there is always a split between dharmic religions and abhrahamic religions..
arjunbala4u: If you ask me, there is no divide
me: back then.... during mahabharata days... i'm talking about the actual war rather than the story... they dint have this concept of religion..rather just a concept of how to live..
arjunbala4u: No da. I wouldnt agree. All sorts of practices existed then as well. It was the seeker who chose his path
me: oh yeah..there is ... western religions are diffrent... they are more existential...while eastern religion is metaphysical..
arjunbala4u: Dei, its all about existence ultimately. In Christianity, Jesus said 'I Am', In Hinduism it was said that Brahman was without beginning or without end, beyond time and space........that means unalloyed existence only da
me: no dude... when it came to hinduism..buddhism..etc.. it wasn't about this life at all.. it was always about the ultimate reality..which is purely metaphysical... western religions have a concept of creator god..and it is always about this life...and how to make THIS life happy... it was concernd mostly with morality and ethics..
me: machan christian teachings are non metaphysical..you are not allowed to contemplate on god in islam.... no matter how much i try to convince you..unless you relaise the basic split you wont agrree with me..
arjunbala4u: Macha, at the superficial level, Im not bothered.......ultimately Truth is the same....if its different, it cannot be true ?! If reality was different, then it cant be real ?? Its only perceptions of yours and mine that takes he focus off the reality and creaties disparity and diffrences
me: there question here is about not you and me..its about the teachings of western and easter rel... they are both diff... the concept of heaven and hell...things like that are so western... the core of hinduism and buddhism is concept of dharam, karma...etc..which is totally absent from western rel...
arjunbala4u: Moreover, concepts, systems etc..... are man-made.... you told me that right ?? Why bother about that then ??
me: i;m not bothered mama... the question is about the basic diff between the two thoughts... i'm just putting my points on the table... that is it...
arjunbala4u: My belief, obviously personal......the concepts and systems were made to suit different mental capacities.......and to put them on the path to the Truth. Once the truth is reached, all differences drop off, all beliefs drop off, all learnings drop off, all efforts cease....only abidance and being in the present exists
no no
you told me that last time machi
now you are concerned about them ?
me: hmm.. there is no truth concept in christianity machan..you tell me where exacly in bible or koran does it say that there is a ultimate reality... beyod trancedence .... there, there is only a creator god who created the universe in 7 days and wanted man to be happy in this life and righteous so that he can go to this disney land called heaven...
arjunbala4u: Anyhow, Im not criticizin you or anything. Its a healthy discussion, not meant at smashing egos
Macha.........Jesus said 'I Am'
that itself means existence
me: dude... jesus is a man... jesus dint say meditate..jesus said love one another... now did buddha say love one another? may be to reduce your karma...but buddha was always concered about people knowing the ultimate workings of this universe so that they can free themselves ... there's so much asceticism involed in east... in west..asceticm is ungodly... there god "wants" you to enjoy the fruits he has provided..
arjunbala4u: Macha.....forget all that
Jesus said - Before he was, I AM
what do you say to that ?
you said you believe only in existence right ?
Thats why Im talking about that.....
If you dont want to talk about it, I respect that
Im not forcing you in any way
We can get back to our chat bout Art of Living
Lol
me: i dont have a belief... unless i realise things myself i dont belive anything..that becomes a dogma then..but that doesnt mean i wont try it out...
yeah ok
arjunbala4u: Correct
Correct
I agree with you.............have no beliefs, no concepts
but that has to be your permanent nature
is that possible ?
Its not possible for me to be without beliefs or concepts for more than few minutes, because of my lousy mind !
me: very impossible .... you can throw away concepts just like that... that was how you were nurutred..with lang.. ideas..concepts... you'd have to do a lot of unlearning...
arjunbala4u: yes
true
me: *you can't
arjunbala4u: yes, so do you agree that the mind is the source of all the bullshit ?
me: not the mind dude.... its the chanelling of mind is bullshit... you dont channel it with this process called learning..language ... ideas... you do it by something called medidation...
arjunbala4u: okay.....but thats all within the perimeter of the mind right ? Then whats your definition of mind ?
me: hmm... i don't think so... i think if mind is properly channelled it could reveal more than what we know right now... but whether that revelation is THE ultimate reality is the question... you cant know unless you realise it for yourself....
if you can get this pdf ..and read it
URL http: //faculty.virginia.edu/consciousness/Word%20Consciousness.pdf
arjunbala4u: true
yo are right
then how do you intend to realise the reality ?
me: unlearn...medidate.. look inwards.. its easy to say.. but takes balls of determination to do...
arjunbala4u: correct
looking inwards is the only way ultimately
because you were looking outwards all along these days, got pissed off and started looking inwards ?
me: dude... i'm not pissed at all.. i still take pleasure in "earthly delights"... its just that i've always questioned things..and wanted to know how things work.. thats why i'm a bit spiritual... i still have no belief in god or an higher power etc... but that doesnt mean i'm earthly... i have my own balance between my existential life and my metaphysical quest...
arjunbala4u: Btw, do you know the actual meaning of Brahman or God or Reality ?
as per Vedanta
?
me: those are just concepts dude... dont seek meaning... you cant know the universe with meaning and concepts..that is so earthly and scientific way of doing things.. you can only REALISE brahman.. realiseation doesnt have to involve meaning at all.. its like enlightment.. you just "get it" .. it comes to you...
arjunbala4u: you are not curious even ? you know so much already so why dont you just listen to this ? lol
: )
me: yeah mama.. go ahead.. i'm always curiosn.. as i said b4..i think i have a questionig mind... so i'm really curious abt things...
arjunbala4u: lets just enjoy the present moment and discuss whatever shit, and screw it all later ?
me: no da go ahead .. tell me what vedanta says
or i'll finish my dosa in 5 mins..then we'll get back?
arjunbala4u: the meaning and attributes of brahman or God or reality, all being te same
is Sat-chit-anandam ........... existence - consciousness/awareness - bliss
did you hear this anywhere ?
me: yeah i read abt sat chit anandam...
arjunbala4u: That is the meaning
Truth cant obviously differe
me: ur just quoting texts m ama,,, dont use texts. tel me ur views mama'
abt reality
arjunbala4u: I dont have views.......because thats again an interpretation of something I havent experieced
moreover, If I experience, I believe that I wont have anything more to say.....
me: yeah tell thhat... how do u think the universe came abt?
arjunbala4u: Macha, the ultimate reality is said to be beyond all forms of expression da
me: dont just take that,, ask why?
arjunbala4u: we are wasting our time discussing about it, instead of seeking it.....
exactly
okay
in sleep, did we have any arguments ? cliched I know, but tell me
me: hmm.. ok.. i'll finish eating and get back
arjunbala4u: okay
one thing
Im not really interested in the creation of th universe
that is highly debated
we can go on for hours with what if this and that etc
I would prefer that we talk about ourselves
and that pdf you sent
lets talk about what we can relate to
hope thats fine
me: yeah ok..read that while i'm eating
arjunbala4u: ill have grub as wwell
brb
9 minutes...
arjunbala4u: back
check this out. Yes, its Ramana Maharishi who wrote this in a cave on a hill, and therefore its not by a double Phd. from some major university in a metropolis. http: //www.arunachala-ramana.org/whoami.htm
He wrote it purely out of his experience, and there is no reference to anyones or any other philosophy, but out of pure experience.
: )
nice stuff........the pdf is good material, but will take time to read
me: yeah.. a lot of time... skip first 9 chapters if r not interested in sciece
arjunbala4u: its fine
I want to read the whole thing
but you check out what I sent you
me: yeah..reading..
arjunbala4u: Cool da, even they talk of Adi Sankara....have you checked him out ?
me: yeah dude... this is mostly a marriage betweeen quantum physics and eastern thought....
yeah adi sankarar..i dont know lot abt him..
arrjunbala4u: But let me ask you this.....is this guy who wrote this, talking out of experience or inferences ?
me: this wasn;t writtern by a so called "saint" but by a professor.... it is as good as ramana
arjunbala4u: Not that da. Is professor talking out of experience?
Lol....its not about saint or professor macha !
its about experience or inference !
Just curious
me: yeah..he might have experienced it... he is very much into eastern philosophy.. but then his audience is primarily wester.. so he doesnt bring some logic etc in the subject.. but that shudn't bother you... read it..and you might realise a few things..
*so he DOES bring
arjunbala4u: macha it does bother me in the sense, that I dont really buy into people who talk of other peoples experiences
The same thing you said about the youtube vidoe the other day
but its fine, since its information, I will read it anyhow
me: dude.. all along your quoting texts..your telling me what ramans; thought is...but you dont buy what other ppl are telling you... thats sounds like hypocrite...
arjunbala4u: macha, i told you earlier.....lol
its not about ramana or saint or professor
its about experience vs. inferences
why you getting worked up ?
Thats your funda also right ?
me: yeah da you infer something from their experience... thats what happnd with the prof too.. so there is no harm in reading that..in fact that shud be easy to understand..than reading abt someone's exp...
no da..i'm not trying to get a rise outta of you...
arjunbala4u: lol
nothings risin except my dick when its horny
me: yeah... can't help that... no matter what we do
arjunbala4u: yeah
But dont think im stuck up on ramana
I read some Osho and Krishnamurti and a german philosopher as well
they all spoke from their experience
which is why I said so
But dont check out the link I sent you if you are against saints
I dont intend to compel you, but you have a wrong notion about them. In fact society itself does, thanks to some clowns who ruined others reputations. Lol
me: ramana dint call himseflf a saint.. only other ppl call saint.. i only dont read ppl who call themselves saint
arjunbala4u: You will soon realise that Ramana was and is not the body or the name
Nice stuff da
In fact, this guy is saying the same thing ?! How un-surprising ? Its nice to be reminded that Truth is still one and only
Even Nisargadatta's sayings are amazing
Some guy in the Orkut Ramana's community put up a thread of Nisargadattas sayings
Dei
there ?
Im not reading anymore of it da.....this bugger is referring to sages and others who have experienced reality......and is inferring from that.....I think I may as well take hints and read material written by those sages itself ?!
Dont be hurt....Its my philosophy......I believe in experience and not inference drawn based on imagination
Likewise, you dont have to read Ramana because I sent you the link
i'm not reading it since you sent..i'm reading it because i like it... i dont mind reading anything... anyway brb
arjunbala4u: no issues
Just that he was quoteing nisargadatta every other time, I may as well pick up the latters book.
lol
I think its practical also
: )
me: heh..yeah.
arjunbala4u: Lol
Try checking out experiences of people who met Nisargadatta, ramana, if posssible Buddha also.....they are fascinating
Dont be hurt by my statements
mama
I agree with whatever is said in the pdf...... I will read it sometime patiently. No issues. But experience is my goal
have you tried it ?
Do you want help ? I can explain to you out of my experience
me: haha... machan i'm not hurt dude.. to be frank.. i dont think you can hurt me with your arguements etc.... so dont feel bad etc...
arjunbala4u: thats nice to hear.
me: dude... i dont need any help... hehe... :) what ever gave you that idea.. i'm not confused at all... infact i'm much more clearer in thought than you are... i cant vouch for this... but thats what i think..
arjunbala4u: If you are interested, I can explain what I have read on the mind
okay, then I need some help from you
me: yeh..that you can do..i'm interested in hearing your thoughts....
arjunbala4u: Whats the I thought ?
Most of the guys spoke about I thought or I concept otherwise known as ego
me: the I? hmm... the pdf calls it aware ness... i kinda agree with that...
arjunbala4u: is it based on the pdf that you are talking or experience ?
me: what i know... what i realise to a certain extent..
arjunbala4u: so its basically awareness of everything else, the I thought ?
Whats that to do with Realisation or reality ?
me: no... it is the awareness itself..not the thing that is aware of or the things the awareness is aware of... but just the awareness in itself..
it is the reality...
or it isn't
arjunbala4u: how macha ? what about other thoughts then ?
me: may be... may be not...
what is a thought?
arjunbala4u: Good qn
I dunno
how do you explain ?
But one request.............
me: hmm... i'm not sure abt it..anyway i haven;t given much thought about what actually is a thought... may be later.... anyway on a call mama
arjunbala4u: can we dis associate the discussion from a physical plane ?
fine
no prob
Then what of self realisation ?
lol
whats that connection with the mind ?
me: dude... on a call da..
arjunbala4u: now ?
shall I call you now, or do you want to refresh your concepts first ?
me: brb
arjunbala4u: okay
okay mama, Im gonna shower now. Let me know when I should call you.
Forgive my ignorance at all times. : )
Bye then
/* A chat between me and my friend some years ago. Feels good to know that a lot has changed */
Comments (View)